|Faculty Handbook -
Handbook for contracts dated prior to 7/1/03 (PDF)
4.0 FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND WORKING CONDITIONS
4.1 Faculty Professional Development
Faculty development includes enhancement, support, and reward of the development of teaching, scholarship and balancing the demands of faculty roles.
4.1.1 Doctoral Study Program - Board of Governors
The Board of Governors established the Doctoral Study Assignment Program to allow selected faculty members to pursue up to one year of full-time study toward the doctoral degree. Faculty members selected to participate in the program will be allowed to pursue doctoral studies in an accredited university on a full-time basis during the period of the award. They will continue to receive their full salary and other benefits for the period of study, and will remain as employees of the institutions where they are currently employed. Faculty members selected for these study assignments are responsible for all educational and personal costs associated with their studies, including tuition, moving expenses, travel, and any other such expenses. (See Section 13.2.1 for additional information.
4.1.2 Faculty Exchanges
Faculty may participate in national or international exchanges with the approval of their department chairs and the VCAA. Information about faculty exchange opportunities is available from the Office of Academic Affairs.
4.1.3 Institutional Grants (see Section 6.5)
4.1.4 Professional Development Leave (formerly Off-Campus Scholarly Assignment SD1488S) amended by SD5404S and SD4506S
Professional development leaves are a means by which UNC Asheville supports continued professional growth for its faculty. Such assignments provide institutional encouragement and support to the faculty in developing, maintaining, and broadening academic and instructional competencies that are valued by the individual faculty member, his or her academic program, and by the university. Given the importance of professional development projects to faculty renewal/professional growth, Chairs should work with their faculty and their program area AVC to develop long-term plans for distributing this resource across all eligible faculty. For the purpose of clarity, the word “Chair” refers to either a department Chair or Program Director as appropriate.
Because of normal budgetary limitations, it is assumed that approximately 3% of the total full-time faculty may be allocated professional development assignments in any given year. Faculty are encouraged to continue seeking private or federal grant support for fellowships to support additional faculty development and travel.
The Provost will insure that minorities and women are not disadvantaged by the established process
All full-time teaching faculty members who have served at UNC Asheville for a minimum of four years are eligible; however, members with tenure will be given preference. No faculty member will normally be eligible to receive a professional development assignment more than once every six years. Exceptions may be negotiated for extraordinary opportunities which may arise.
184.108.40.206 Procedures for Application, Approval, and Accountability
Chairs should be involved in all phases of developing a professional development assignment proposal. Interested faculty members should initiate the process by discussing a proposed project with their Chair. Projects should be written as proposals that include a detailed statement of the activity that the applicant expects to undertake.
A professional development assignment may be granted for up to one full year. The university will support the recipient with either one semester at full salary or two semesters at one-half salary. Health insurance and retirement benefit coverage varies with the conditions of the professional development assignment. Specifics should be developed in consultation with the Office of Human Resources.
Most departments will be able to adjust offerings and assignments to accommodate professional development without significantly complicating student programs. However, Chairs are encouraged to meet with their Dean to discuss the need for adjunct faculty to support a professional development assignment.
Most faculty elect to count this time toward promotion and tenure. However, an applicant may consult with the Chair, tenured faculty, and/or the program area Dean and elect to exclude time (stop the clock). The written proposal should indicate the manner in which the applicant wishes the time to be counted.
The faculty member and Chair are strongly encouraged to review the description of "leaves of absence" in Section 14.2 and to consult with the Provost to differentiate such leaves from "professional development assignments."
Before submitting the application, the faculty member must circulate a draft proposal to the chair/program director and tenured faculty. These individuals may provide feedback regarding the benefits to the applicant’s professional development and/or advice about strengthening the proposal. A final version must be evaluated by the Department or Program area assembled tenured faculty prior to its submission to the program area Dean.
Application (Edited by Provost and VCAA, 2007)
Applications for professional development assignments are evaluated once each academic year. To be considered for a fall, spring, or full-year assignment, application must be made by the announced deadline of the preceding academic year.
Applications are submitted to the appropriate Dean. A completed application should include
* A proposal for the professional development project.
* A letter from the department chair, indicating the department support/nonsupport and any anticipated resource implications generated by the assignment (e.g. need for adjunct faculty).
The Dean reads the complete application, adds a letter of support/nonsupport, and forwards the packet to the faculty review committee. (Note: All letters must be copied to the applicant.)
The program area Dean forwards the completed application and Dean letter to the faculty committee for review. The committee will be composed of the two members of University Research Council (URC) and two members of the University Teaching Council (UTC). Individuals chosen will be members who are beginning the second year of their 2-year terms. The committee ranks the proposals based on the following unprioritized criteria:
* feasibility of project (including likelihood of outside funding, if applicable)
* potential to contribute to faculty renewal/professional growth
* prior leave awarded to faculty member
* productive use of prior leaves (if applicable)
* resource implications for home department
The committee transmits its ranked list with supporting comments/suggestions for improvement to the Provost no later than the end of November.
Decision (Edited by Provost and VCAA, 2007)
The Provost will communicate decisions in writing to the faculty members by January 15, with a copy to the department chair and Dean. If the Provost approves of the professional development leave, a contract for such an assignment will be prepared which will designate the specific conditions and dates for the professional development assignment. Where the off-campus assignment requires institutional nomination or approval of the applicant, the Office of the Provost will be responsible for expediting the process to meet external agency requirements and deadlines. The contract will also require the faculty member to guarantee as one of the conditions for the assignment that he or she will return to full-time teaching at UNC Asheville for a minimum of one full academic year following the professional development assignment. The Provost has the discretion to defer a successfully reviewed Professional Development Leave for up to one year, following Chair/Program Director and program area Dean consultation, without the faculty member resubmitting a proposal. The Board of Trustees of UNC Asheville must grant final approval for all professional development assignments.
A proposed negative decision must be accompanied by brief but specific reasons for rejecting the application and will include feedback on improving the current proposal, if appropriate, in order to enhance the likelihood of acceptance in the future. Proposals may be resubmitted the following year.
Upon completion of a professional development assignment, the recipient must prepare a brief written report describing all professional activities during the period of the assignment, and provide an evaluation of accomplishments. The report is submitted to the department chair, who adds evaluative comments and sends these to the Director of Teaching and Learning, program area Dean and the Provost.
NOTE: Chairs/Program Directors who wish to apply for professional development assignments should initiate the process with the program area Dean, but should otherwise follow the procedures outlined above. In addition, Chairs/Program Directors are also asked to submit the name(s) of available interim replacements.
NOTE: Members of the Faculty Senate who are selected for Professional Development Leave shall resign from the Faculty Senate. (SD8208S)
4.1.5 Professional Travel Policy
The University provides support for faculty to travel on university related business. In all cases in which the faculty member is traveling on University business, he/she must have received prior authorization from their Department Chair and the VCAA. The reason for prior authorization is to insure that the faculty member is covered under Workman's Compensation in the event of injury or accident. This requirement applies whether or not the faculty member is requesting reimbursement from University funds. See UNCA PPM #3 for more details.
Academic Affairs strongly encourages all faculty to be actively involved in their professional disciplines. As an inducement faculty will receive full funding support up to a predetermined maximum in order to travel to conferences, workshops, symposia, etc. The specific activities the university will support are as follows:
- Instruction related travel: All travel for the purpose of conducting a course will be supported. Field trips, school visits, internship visitations, and related activities will receive normal university funding.
- University required travel: All travel required by the University will be supported.
- Funding maximums change from year to year.
The State of North Carolina imposes clear maximums on reimbursements for food and lodging for travel in the State of North Carolina and outside the State. These reimbursements are subject to change, therefore faculty should consult the business office for the currently approved rates. The State imposes no limit on transportation expenses, but does insist that individuals travel by the least expensive mode that is feasible.
Specific forms must be completed relative to Faculty Travel. Each faculty secretary has a supply of those forms and is familiar with the procedures involved. The needed forms are listed below:
- Travel Authorization Form (must be completed prior to making a trip).
- Form for request to use a state car
- Travel Reimbursement Form
Driver's License on File: The individual is required to have on file with the University a copy of a valid driver's license if he/she wishes to use a State Vehicle.
Use of personal car: One may elect to use their personal car and be reimbursed at the approved rate.
Questions relative to faculty travel should be directed to the VCAA. Also faculty should consult UNCA PPM #3.
4.1.6 Tuition free courses for Faculty and Staff (see Section 7.17)
4.1.7 External Professional Activities of Faculty and Professional Staff (see Section 13.2.4)
4.1.8 Center for Teaching and Learning (see Section 11)
4.1.9 Mentoring Program for New Faculty (SD8108S)
The New Faculty Mentoring Program is a volunteer program that welcomes new colleagues to UNC Asheville and provides support as they adapt to the culture, expectations, and pace of our institution. New faculty are matched with experienced faculty who act as personal mentors during the coming years. Mentors volunteer for the program and new faculty have the opportunity to meet and select their personal mentors. Faculty are encouraged to pair with mentors from a different academic department so that they can benefit from an objective and confidential partnership and begin to form connections with colleagues outside of their home departments. For tenure-track faculty members, mentors can serve as confidential advisors during the progression towards contract renewal, tenure and promotion. In addition to opportunities for private mentoring meetings, participating faculty and mentors are invited to a series of social gatherings each semester.
4.2 Faculty Leaves of Absence
Approval for either a special assignment or a leave of absence requires approval of the faculty member's Department Chair/Program Director, the VCAA, the Chancellor, and the UNC Asheville Board of Trustees. See Section III of UNCA Tenure Policies and Regulations, located in Section 14.2.
4.2.1 With Pay
UNC does not have a formal system of state funded sabbaticals. UNC does allow faculty to serve with pay on certain special assignments. Family/medical leave and leaves of absence paid by non-state funds also are permissible.
220.127.116.11 Special Assignments
UNC Asheville permits leaves paid by state funds for two types of special assignments described in Section 4.1:
* Faculty Exchange
* Off-Campus Scholarly Assignment
18.104.22.168 Family and Medical Leave (SD2495S) amended by SD0511F SD4900S
Members of the UNC Asheville faculty entitled to benefits may apply under this policy for up to a semester off with full pay. While brief absences from faculty duties, including teaching, can usually be accommodated informally for up to four weeks, those that involve prolonged illness and/or disability can result in significant burdens to colleagues, especially in small departments. Furthermore, the faculty person who must call upon that assistance may face uncertainties and discomforts concerning the employment situation at a time of great personal stress. Finally, state employees who work at less than three-quarter time without leave are not eligible to receive benefits such as health insurance and contributions toward retirement. This policy is designed to overcome these difficulties in a manner consistent with The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, The Code of The University of North Carolina and The Regulations on Academic Freedom, Tenure and Due Process of The University of North Carolina at Asheville. This leave is not allowable as terminal leave payment when the faculty member leaves the employment of the University. It may not be used to extend years of creditable state service for retirement benefits. However, it may be exhausted prior to participation in the Disability Income Plan, provided to state employees.
This policy applies to persons holding at least three-quarter time regular faculty appointments (professor, associate/assistant professor, lecturer, instructor) who are also eligible for participation in either the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System or the Optional Retirement Program. It does not apply to faculty members with twelve-month appointments annually; these persons are covered under a separate leave policy of the Board of Governors.
A full-time faculty appointment is for twelve contact hours per semester of combined instruction and formal reassigned time, whether administrative or discretionary. Faculty members may not work at less than three-quarter time, after accounting for reassigned time, for longer than four weeks without leave, because this makes faculty members ineligible for all benefits, including Family and Medical Leave. The Program Area Dean should be notified of any informal accommodation of faculty members working at less than full-time for longer than one week.
II. Benefit and Use of Leave
A) A faculty member who has been at least three-quarter time for at least one year may request leave with full pay and benefits for up to one semester, or twelve weeks over two consecutive semesters, exclusive of academic breaks, for any of the following conditions:
* medically verifiable extended illness or serious disability;
* birth and care of a newborn;
* placement with the employee of a child for adoption or foster care and care of that child within one year of placement;
* care-giving responsibilities for a seriously ill child, spouse/domestic partner, parent or other dependent;
* any qualifying exigency arising out of the fact that a spouse, son, daughter, or parent is a covered military member on active duty (or has been notified of an impending call to active duty);
In none of the above cases can family and medical leave be granted for longer than one full semester, nor can a second leave of twelve weeks be granted until the faculty member has returned to full-time status for one year. More than one family and medical leave may be granted in an academic year, but total leave in that year for any of the above reasons may not exceed twelve weeks except in the case where a full semester’s leave is granted.
B) A faculty member who is the spouse, son, daughter, or next of kin of a covered service member may request leave with full pay and benefits for up to 26 weeks within any 12-month period to care for that person if he or she has a serious injury or illness incurred in the line of duty, including medical treatment, recuperation, or therapy; or otherwise in outpatient status or on the temporary disability retired list.
III. Administration of Benefit
It is the responsibility of the faculty member to request the use of leave provided by this policy as soon as possible upon learning of the need for the leave. This request will normally be made in a letter to the department chair/program director.
The department chair/program director will make a recommendation to the Program Area Dean, who will make a recommendation to the Provost and VCAA concerning whether or not to grant the request for leave. When the request is the result of the faculty member's illness or disability, the department chair/program director will recommend leave if it is supported by medical information. When the request is to care for the faculty member's family member, domestic partner or dependent, the department chair/program director may base the recommendation on other factors, including the needs of the unit, timing within the academic year, effect on students, ability of the unit to compensate for the absence, etc.
The Provost and VCAA will request medical verification of the faculty member's illness or disability, including a physician's statement about the probable length of absence from normal duties. If the request is for the purpose of caring for a faculty member's family member, domestic partner or dependent, the Provost and VCAA will request medical verification of the illness or disability of that person. This information will be confidential and will be stored in the Office of Academic Affairs. To facilitate the gathering of necessary verification, the Provost and VCAA may request the assistance of the Office of Human Resources.
The Provost and VCAA is responsible for making a decision on whether or not to approve leave after reviewing the department chair/program director's recommendation. The Provost and VCAA will provide written notification of the decision to the faculty member with copies to the department chair/program director and the Program Area Dean. The Provost and VCAA will provide a copy of the notice to the Office of the Chancellor and the Human Resources Department. Whenever the Provost and VCAA approves leave under this policy, he/she is responsible for working out an arrangement with the department chair/program director for covering the duties of the person on leave.
In all cases, approved, but not used, leave shall not accumulate nor be carried forward from academic year to academic year. This policy does not preclude requesting leaves for non-medical or serious disability reasons.
If illness or disability requires an absence from faculty duties beyond the approved salary continuation period, the faculty member may petition for a leave of absence without pay under procedures described in Section 22.214.171.124 of the Faculty Handbook. Faculty members are entitled to up to 52 weeks of unpaid leave within any five year period under the North Carolina Family Illness Leave Act. For information regarding the Disability Income Plan and other disability plans offered to University employees on an optional basis, faculty members should contact the Human Resources Department.
The Provost and VCAA’s decision not to grant a request for leave under this policy may be appealed to the Chancellor.
Communications concerning leave requested or granted under this policy are subject to the same confidentiality requirements as other personnel records.
Because this policy provides an important financial benefit, accurate records on its invocation must be maintained. The Office of the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs will maintain the official records and, every three years from the date of approval or sooner if necessary, will make general reports on its use to other University administrators and to the Faculty Senate.
VII. Coordination with Other Policies
As stated in Section 3.5.3, a leave of absence due to maternity or primary-care duties automatically extends the probationary period of tenure-track faculty by one year unless otherwise requested by the faculty member and authorized by the Provost and VCAA.
The terms of this policy pertain only to a leave with full pay for a specified period because of illness or disability. This policy has no effect on provisions for leave without pay as described in the Handbook for Faculty.
The leave with full pay provided for under this policy shall have no effect on the faculty member's other employment benefits.
126.96.36.199 Leaves Paid By Non-State Funds
Leaves of absence paid from non-state funds may be allowed with the approval of the UNC Asheville Board of Trustees and the President of the University.
4.2.2 Without Pay
188.8.131.52 Elected Office and Civil Leaves (see Section 13.2.5)
184.108.40.206 Requested Unpaid Leave
A leave of absence without pay is possible with the approval of the Chancellor and the UNC Asheville Board of Trustees. Leave requests are initiated at the department or program level and proceed through the chair or director to the Office of the Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs. The VCAA makes a recommendation to the Chancellor.
4.3 Working Conditions
4.3.1 Academic Regalia
Faculty are expected to wear academic regalia at commencement and special ceremonies such as installation of the Chancellor and at the Fall Convocation. Academic regalia may be rented through the UNC Asheville Bookstore.
4.3.2 Alcoholic Beverage Policy (see Section 7.1)
4.3.3 Attendance at Faculty Meetings and Formal Exercises
Faculty are expected to attend all formal exercises such as commencement, convocation, departmental faculty meetings, assigned committee meetings, and scheduled duty during registration days. If a faculty member for some reason cannot meet his/her scheduled responsibilities he/she is to notify the Department Chair/Program Director or Committee Chair.
All full-time faculty members are expected to attend all called faculty meetings. The Department Chair is to be notified if a faculty member cannot attend a meeting of the faculty. Faculty meetings are called at the beginning and end of each academic semester plus at the end of the second five-week summer session.
Special faculty meetings may be called by the President of the University, the Chancellor, or the VCAA. Faculty also may request a Faculty Meeting through the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate. (See Constitution of the Faculty Senate, Section 14.1). Such requests should include a proposed agenda, rationale for the special meeting and suggested date and time. Should the Executive Committee approve the request, the VCAA will call the meeting.
4.3.4 Drug Abuse and Controlled Substance Policy (see Section 7.5)
4.3.5 Office Support
220.127.116.11 Office Space and Clerical Assistance
Full-time faculty can expect in his/her office a desk, book shelving, filing cabinet and chairs, a telephone, access to a departmental secretary for provision of course related clerical services and typing and as time permits typing of manuscripts, and mail service to the departments. Budget permitting, a work study student who may assist faculty may be assigned to an academic department. Within budget constraints faculty may utilize the services of Printing Services and Publications. A limited number of private carrels are available in the library (see Section 5.6).
Guidelines for Work to be Assigned to Department/Program Assistants
(From the final report of the Academic Office Support Study Team; accepted by the Chancellor 08/16/07)
1. Core duties: There is a core set of duties that are common to the majority of academic office support positions. These duties include:
A. Office Support
1. Handle mail (postal, campus, fax, and email), to include deliveries
2. Keep office organized, to include filing
3. Prepare and post faculty schedules
4. Answer phones, greet visitor, respond to questions, and provide information.
5. Scan and copy documents as requested
6. Assist faculty and students with use of office equipment
7. Coordinate maintenance of office equipment
8. Coordinate set up office for new hires, including technology, furniture, supplies,
and other materials
9. Prepare work order and key requests
10. Schedule faculty appointments as requested
11. Pick up and/or drop off departmental materials on campus as requested
(going off campus would be rare)
12. Provide students with information, forms, and supplies as needed; post information on the bulletin boards
13. Order textbooks and/or other educational materials, which may include communication with textbook publishers regarding new editions, ancillary packages, and best pricing options
B. Financial Support
1. Access and print departmental budget information as requested, provide budget-related information to faculty and students as needed, monitor related budgets, and maintain spreadsheets
2. Check monthly telephone and fax records
3. Process requisitions/purchase orders, manage inventory, and maintain related electronic and paper records
4. Prepare check and payroll requests and maintain related electronic and paper records
Scope: number of faculty, student employees, and work study students
5. Prepare and track faculty travel for the chair, faculty, and department visitors
C. Print and Electronic Documents/Resources
1. Prepare department-related reports and other documents for faculty
2. Create, update, maintain, and transmit departmental forms
3. Prepare certificates and awards for presentation each semester
4. Assist with departmental advertising (i.e. brochures, bulletin boards, display boards,
CDs, videos, etc)
5. Maintain faculty, applicant, student worker, work study student, and other departmental
files, both print and electronic
6. Prepare and distribute instructor evaluations, including student comments
7. Maintain databases (i.e. faculty, students, prospective students, alumni, publishers,
donors, and fundraising)
D. Meeting, Event, and Outreach Support
1. Serve as a point of contact for other university departments, students, visitors, and the community; respond to questions; and provide information – this may include working with the Public Information Department to provide information in response to media questions
2. Handle logistics for routine meetings for faculty and students, this could include reservation of rooms, equipment, and simple refreshments
3. Assist with student and departmental activities and special events
E. Student Workers (temporary and work study)
1. Train and supervise student workers
2. Discouraged/Prohibited Activities: There also is a set of duties that are outside the boundaries
of core duties for academic office support positions. Some are to be discouraged; others are
A. Activities to be Discouraged
- Participating in activities that routinely take office assistants out of their offices for a prolonged period of time during the normal workday.
- Running off-campus errands.
- Driving for field trips.
B. Activities Prohibited
- Violating copyright laws at the request of anyone.
- Typing personal correspondence for anyone.
- Serving as the contact persons for personal communications and business of the faculty, such as for things offered for sale through electronic fora.
- Receiving email for a faculty member.
- Proctoring examinations.
- Supervising a class for a faculty member.
- Grading of any course-related work: examinations, quizzes, papers, reports, homework, etc.
- Substituting for faculty in advising students in the requirements of the major or minor or in the requirements of the ILS, including the distribution of RAN numbers.
- Completing any work unrelated to the faculty’s professional expertise for off-campus organizations in which a faculty member is involved. When in doubt, the office assistant should consult the chair/director or the appropriate dean.
- Driving faculty and visitors, including candidates, on and off campus.
- Performing any non-work related activities. When in doubt, the office assistant should consult the chair/director or the appropriate dean.
18.104.22.168 Computer Services (see Section 5.3)
22.214.171.124 Mail Services (see Section 7.11)
126.96.36.199 Ordering Equipment and Supplies
Equipment and supplies are purchased with departmental funds. Purchase orders must be completed, usually by the department secretary, and approved by the department chair/program director. See UNCA PPM #14 for more information.
4.3.6 Research Policies
188.8.131.52 Animal Subjects Policy
The UNC Asheville Animal Care Committee (ACC) must approve projects which utilize live animals. ACC addresses public concerns about humane treatment of experimental animals, assures compliance with relevant legislation, monitors moral and ethical obligations to other living organisms, provides institutional assurances for granting agencies, and protects investigators and students from unsubstantiated or unwarranted allegations of improper procedures.
Any project by a UNC Asheville investigator (faculty or student) or any teaching procedure which requires the use of live animals must submit an application for animal use to ACC. These rules do not apply to plants, bacteria or protozoans. Information concerning applicable guidelines may be obtained from the ACC. If a previously approved project is revised or requires significant changes from the approved techniques, a supplemental form listing the changes must be submitted.
Applications can be obtained from and should be returned to the Director of Sponsored Scholarship and Programs. The form should be typed and each questions should be answered in specific detail or noted "not applicable". All applications require one copy of the application form and one copy of the complete grant proposal or instructor's syllabus (for teaching activities). After review and approval (2-3 weeks normally), the Chair of the ACC will send notification of approval to the Principal Investigator or to the student's research advisor.
184.108.40.206 Institutional Review Board (formerly Human Subjects) Policy (SD3110S) (SD0393F)
The UNC Asheville Institutional Review Board (IRB) is charged by the University with reviewing all University activities involving human research subjects, according to the Department of Health and Human Service’s Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46), in order to safeguard the welfare and rights of research participants, including research related to class assignments. The UNC Asheville policy on human subjects applies to all faculty, student, and staff research involving human subjects, regardless of funding source. The UNC Asheville IRB reviews behavioral research protocols; investigators wishing to conduct invasive biomedical research activities should seek approval from an external IRB certified for such review.
220.127.116.11.2 Policies and Procedures
IRB procedures and policy will be updated as necessary in order to remain compliant with 45 CFR 46, and any applicable state or local laws. UNC Asheville IRB policies as well as links to 45 CFR 46 are available at http://irb.unca.edu. Faculty members are encouraged to consult this site for updated procedures and documents.
These regulations apply to all University faculty, staff, and students.
Policies on Research Activities
- Except as provided under Exempt Activities (45 CFR 46.101b), all research activities involving human subjects conducted by UNC Asheville faculty, students, and staff must receive IRB Review before such activities begin. Student projects involving human subjects must be reviewed and approved by the IRB before research activities begin. This includes course-related work.
- The “IRB shall review and have authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research activities covered by this policy” (CFR 46.109). Officials of the institution may disapprove research approved by the IRB, but those officials may not approve any research that has not been approved by an IRB. (CFR 46.112).
- The IRB may suspend or terminate approval of research that is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or that has been associated with unexpected serious harm to subjects (CFR 46.113).
- IRB approval is limited to one calendar year (CFR 46.109e), after which continuing review should be sought.
- No investigator may involve a human being as a subject in research covered by this policy unless the investigator has obtained the legally effective informed consent of the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative (46.116)
- When some or all of the subjects are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence, such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons, additional safeguards may be required to protect the rights and welfare of these subjects (46.111b). Additional regulations may be required for pregnant women and fetuses (46.204), neonates (46.205), children (46.401), and prisoners (46.301).
Membership of the IRB conforms to federal guidelines (45 CFR 46.107).
- 6 voting members and 3 alternates, approved by the Provost, in consultation with existing IRB members and FWDC. Faculty members serve staggered three-year terms which may be renewed, while the community representative serves a one-year term which may be renewed.
- Two faculty members who have expertise in research involving human subjects from a behavioral or biomedical research discipline (e.g., Psychology, Management);
- At least one faculty member who has expertise in research using the scientific method but not primarily involving human subjects (e.g., Environmental Science, Chemistry) and one or two faculty members from any discipline to bring total voting faculty membership up to five;
- One member unaffiliated with the university who has expertise in scientific study which may or may not involve human subjects (Community Representative);
- One alternate from each of the above categories
- Representative from the Office of Sponsored Scholarship and Programs, ex officio and non-voting.
- Liaison from Academic Affairs, ex officio and non-voting, as needed, to facilitate the work of the IRB. The Academic Affairs liaison should not participate in IRB deliberations
In appointing the members of the IRB, attention should be paid to gender, racial, and professional diversity.
Committee members are requested to serve a minimum of one full term as specified above, and must maintain IRB Member CITI Training Certification.
The Chair of the IRB must be a tenured member of the faculty. It is best for the Chair to have served two years as a Committee member prior to assuming the role of Chair, and to serve as Chair for more than one year. At the completion of his or her term, outgoing Chairs are requested to attend IRB meetings for one year after their term, either as a formal member of the committee or as an ex officio non-voting member, to serve as a mentor for the new Chair and to promote consistency and continuity.
The IRB may, at its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist in the review of issues which require expertise beyond or in addition to that available on the IRB. These individuals do not have a vote.
No IRB member may participate in an initial or continuing review of any project in which the member has a conflict of interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB. The Chair determines whether a conflict of interest exists.
A quorum shall be at least four of the six members of the IRB, one of whom must have primary concerns in research not involving human subjects.
Recommendations and reports to: Provost
18.104.22.168 Research Misconduct Policy (SD8008S)
In the belief that honesty and integrity are essential to the search for knowledge, it is the policy of The University of North Carolina Asheville that all persons involved in research and scholarship must guard the truth, uphold the highest standards in their research and scholarship, and protect the public trust that the academic environment has long held. Whenever any UNC Asheville faculty member or other research employee is accused of serious misconduct in scientific or scholarly research, the University will conduct an inquiry, make a determination concerning the truth or falsity of the allegations, and take appropriate disciplinary action. The process of inquiry will be expeditious and protect the rights of all those concerned, including the complainant and the accused.
Definition of Research Misconduct
Since the search for knowledge is impeded and subverted by the misrepresentation of facts, openness and honesty are commonly accepted norms within the scientific and scholarly community for proposing, conducting, or reporting research. "Research misconduct" means plagiarism, falsification, fabrication of data, or other forms of deliberate misrepresentation. It does not include honest error or honest differences in interpretations or judgments of data.
Initiation of Inquiry
Allegations of research misconduct involving faculty members or staff should be directed to the Dean of the respondent’s academic division (referred to hereafter as the Dean). The Dean will confidentially counsel any individual who comes forward with an allegation of research misconduct since some concerns or allegations may not fall within the scope of policies and procedures developed to address research misconduct. If the Dean determines that the concern is properly addressed through policies and procedures designed to deal with misconduct in research, these procedures should be discussed with the individual questioning the integrity of a research project. If the individual chooses not to make a formal allegation, but the Dean believes there is sufficient cause to warrant the inquiry, the matter should be pursued without a complainant and the Dean should so inform the Provost.
The Dean, in consultation with the Provost, will determine whether an inquiry is warranted when the subject of the inquiry is faculty or other staff members.
If the inquiry involves a faculty or other staff member, the Dean will appoint an ad hoc Inquiry Committee consisting of three tenured faculty members, two from the Department of the respondent and one from another Department of the University. In case the respondent is a department chair, three faculty members shall be from outside the Department. In the case of a two-faculty department, two faculty members shall be from outside the Department and one from within. In selecting the members of the Committee, potential conflicts of interest must be examined scrupulously and any relationship with parties to the matter must be fully disclosed. Those inquiring into the allegations should be selected in full awareness of the closeness of their professional or personal affiliation with the complainant or the respondent. It is also important that the Committee have appropriate scientific or scholarly expertise to assure a sound knowledge base from which to work. The respondent and complainant will be notified of the charges and process at this time. Committee members should be appointed and convened as soon as possible, provided with the information immediately available, and charged either to complete the inquiry phase within 30 days or to present a report, at that time, to the Dean, the respondent, and the complainant, citing the reasons for delay and progress to date.
During the inquiry, confidentiality will be maintained to protect the rights of all parties involved. It may be desirable to keep the identity of the complainant confidential during the inquiry phase. The Dean will assume responsibility for disseminating information relevant to the inquiry to the appropriate individuals. Normally, this will be in writing with copies filed in the Office of the Provost.
Completion of the inquiry is marked by the determination of whether or not an investigation is warranted. There will be written documentation to summarize the process and state the conclusion of the inquiry. The respondent will be informed whether or not there will be further investigation and, if there is a complainant, he or she will also be informed.
Allegations found to require investigation will be forwarded promptly to the investigative body; if federal funding is involved, federal regulations require that the agency sponsoring the research be notified at this point.
If an allegation is found to be unsupported but has been submitted in good faith, no further formal action, other than informing all involved parties, will be taken. The proceedings of an inquiry, including the identity of the respondent, will be held in strict confidence to protect the parties involved. If confidentiality is breached, the institution will take steps to minimize the damage to reputations that may result from inaccurate reports. Allegations that have not been brought in good faith will lead to disciplinary action.
The institution will seek to protect the complainant against retaliation; individuals engaging in acts of retaliation will be disciplined.
An investigation will be initiated when an inquiry concludes that such is warranted. The purpose is to further explore the allegations and determine whether misconduct has been committed and, if so, the degree of its seriousness. In the course of an investigation, additional information may emerge that justifies broadening the scope of the investigation beyond the initial allegations. The respondent will be informed when significant new directions of investigation are undertaken. The investigation will focus on accusations of research misconduct as defined previously and examined the factual materials of each case.
To carry out the investigation, the Dean will form an Investigative Committee by expanding the Inquiry Committee to include two additional tenured faculty and at least one representative from outside the University. In selecting the members of the committee, conflicts of interest must again be examined scrupulously and any relationship with parties to the matter must be fully disclosed. Those inquiring into the allegations will be selected in full awareness of the closeness of their professional or personal affiliation with the complainant or the respondent. It is also important that the committee have appropriate expertise to assure a sound knowledge base from which to work.
Upon receipt of inquiry findings that an investigation is warranted, the Dean will initiate an investigation promptly, and the complainant and respondent will be notified of the investigation. In accordance with federal regulations, all agencies sponsoring a research project in which misconduct is suspected will be notified immediately upon the decision to undertake an investigation. All involved parties will be interviewed and are obligated to cooperate with the proceedings in providing information relating to the case. All necessary information will be provided to the respondent in a timely manner to facilitate the preparation of a response. The respondent will have the opportunity to address the charges and evidence in detail. The respondent is not required to have legal counsel in the investigation, but may seek counsel if he or she so desires.
If the nature of the allegations is such that there may be need to protect the health and safety of research subjects or the interests of students and colleagues, the Dean may take interim administrative action to restrict or suspend the activities of the respondent, but care should be taken to safeguard the rights of the respondent.
Investigations normally will be completed within 60 days of initiation. If factors such as the volume and nature of the research to be reviewed and the degree of cooperation being offered by the subject of the investigation prevent completion within 60 days, an interim report will be filed with the Dean at the end of 60 days describing the investigation up to that point and its expected outcome, and requesting an extension.
The findings of the investigative committee will be submitted in writing to the Dean. The respondent will receive the full report of the investigation, as will the Chair of the respondent's department. When there is more than one respondent, each shall receive all those parts of the findings that are pertinent to his or her role. Respondents may comment in writing on the report and their comments will be made part of the record. All federal agencies, sponsors, or other entities initially informed of the investigation also must be notified promptly. UNC Asheville will retain the findings of the investigation in a confidential and secure file.
Investigations into allegations of research misconduct may result in various outcomes including 1) a finding of clear, serious, and substantial research misconduct; 2) a finding of research misconduct of a minor or questionable nature; 3) a finding that no culpable conduct was committed, but serious scientific errors were made; 4) a finding that no research misconduct or serious scientific error was committed. If a finding of serious scientific misconduct is made, all agencies funding that research will be informed. The judgment as to the degree of severity on the research misconduct will be solely that of the Investigative Committee. Examples of severe research misconduct include fabrication of data, plagiarism including the publication of research or scholarship produced by another person, and falsification of vita items in order to advance one's research.
If an investigation has been launched on the basis of a complaint, and no research misconduct is found, no disciplinary measures will be taken against the complainant and every effort will be made to prevent retaliatory action against the complainant if the allegations, however incorrect, are found to have been made in good faith. If the allegations are found to have been maliciously motivated, disciplinary actions will be taken against those responsible.
The nature and severity of the disciplinary action by the University will vary with the findings of the Investigative Committee. At this point, the Dean will inform the Chancellor, Provost, and Chair of the respondent’s department of the Investigative Committee’s findings. Should the respondent(s) be found guilty of research misconduct of a clear, serious, and substantial nature, he/she/they may be considered unfit to continue as members of the UNC Asheville faculty. Respondents will be notified by registered mail (receipt requested) by the Chancellor or his or her delegate. Relevant federal agencies, sponsors, collaborators, and editors of journals will be promptly notified of the University's findings. Due process for tenured faculty is provided by Section 603 of the "Code" of the University of North Carolina.
Respondents found guilty of research misconduct of a less clear, serious, or substantial nature may receive sanctions ranging from letters of reprimand from the Provost to probation or permanent removal from the research project involved. Findings of scientific misconduct may also warrant the removal of the faculty respondent from other research supervisory roles.
Respondents may appeal the findings of the University. Respondents have a maximum of ten days after receiving notice of the findings to file a written appeal to the Dean. An appeal of the findings may be based on the evidence presented during the investigative hearings or on a failure of the committee to follow established procedures, in keeping with University policy. New evidence discovered may warrant a new investigation. Sanctions resulting from the findings may also be appealed if the respondent(s) has(ve) reason to believe that the disciplinary penalties are excessive or inappropriate. Respondents who are tenured faculty, and who have been notified by the Chancellor or his/her delegate of the University's intent to discharge them, are provided due process under Section 603 of the "Code" of the University of North Carolina.
4.3.7 Smoking Policy (see Section 7.14)
4.3.8 Policy on Children in the Workplace (SD1697S)
UNC Asheville recognizes that faculty members may occasionally need to bring their children with them to work. However, faculty members are expected to observe the following guidelines when doing so.
1. Parents will assume responsibility for direct supervision of their children. Young children are not to be left unsupervised in public areas (lounges, student center, library, etc.), nor are they to be left in the care of university staff.
2. Parents should prevent children from creating excessive noise or disturbing others in the work environment.
3. Parents will assume liability for their children.
4. Parents should not bring sick children to campus.
Rationale: For many parents child care is a major issue in the conflict between work and family involvement. Since there are occasions when faculty must bring their children to campus, the guidelines above establish some common behavioral expectations. Faculty members have private offices which will allow them to keep their children out of the general departmental workspaces. Because faculty schedules are flexible, they may bring children to the campus for shorter periods of time during the day.
4.3.9 Employment/Supervision of Related Persons (see Section 13.2.2)
4.3.10 Mediation Center (SD1797S)
The Mediation Center is dedicated to helping the university community resolve conflict. Toward this end it offers confidential mediation services at no charge, educational workshops, and group facilitation services. Mediators are UNC Asheville students, faculty, and staff who have completed significant mediation training. Situations appropriate for mediation may include roommate conflicts, grade disputes, dating relationships, property damage, grievances, student organization differences, faculty/staff conflicts, and student/parent issues. The Center is located at 218 Phillips Hall. For more information or a confidential appointment, call 232-5120 or e-mail email@example.com.
4.3.11 Non-Discrimination: Ethnic/Gender/Sexual Orientation
UNC Asheville subscribes to The Code of The University of North Carolina, Section 103, which states:
Admission to, employment by, and promotion in the University of North Carolina and all its constituent institutions shall be on the basis of merit and there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, or national origin.
Furthermore, the University follows N.C.G.S. 126-16 which states:
All state...agencies...of North Carolina shall give equal opportunity for employment without regard to race, religion, color, creed, national origin, age, or physical disability to all persons qualified, except where specific age, sex, or physical requirements constitute bona fide occupational qualifications necessary to proper and efficient administration. The section with respect to equal opportunity as to age shall be limited to individuals who are at least 40 years of age.
Sexual Orientation (SD4091S)
It is the policy of The University of North Carolina at Asheville that an individual's sexual orientation is irrelevant to educational and employment decisions. Any non-faculty employee of The University of North Carolina at Asheville having a complaint of discrimination because of sexual orientation should notify the immediate supervisor or the Director of Human Resources. A faculty member should notify the VCAA; a student should notify the VCSA. At any time, a student or employee may call the Affirmative Action Officer or the Counseling Center. The Senate requests that the VCAA arrange with other chancellors a consistent procedure for pursuing complaints of discrimination.
4.3.12 Sexual Harassment Policy (SD4709S)
The Sexual Harassment Policy adopted by The UNC Asheville Board of Trustees on July 29, 2009; identified as Policy # 49 in UNCA Policies and Procedures Manual.
Title: Sexual Harassment Policy
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to set forth the University’s procedures for preventing sexual harassment and for investigating and resolving allegations of sexual harassment, and also to ensure compliance with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and with Chapter 126 of the North Carolina General Statutes.
Scope: This policy applies to all applicants for employment, to all applicants for admission to University programs, and to all officers and employees of the University, all students, and all persons who serve the University as its agents and are under the control of the University, and to all individuals who teach, conduct business or participate in activities at the University. University contractors are also subject to this policy.
Sexual harassment and discrimination are illegal and endanger the environment of civility and mutual respect that must prevail if the University is to fulfill its mission. The University of North Carolina at Asheville is committed to providing and promoting an atmosphere in which employees can realize their maximum potential in the workplace and students can engage fully in the learning process. Toward this end, all members of the University community must understand that sexual harassment, sexual discrimination and sexual exploitation of professional relationships violate the University’s policy and will not be tolerated. The University will take every step to resolve grievances promptly. Any act of reprisal, interference, or any other form of retaliation, whether direct or indirect, against an individual for raising concerns covered by this policy are also violations of this policy and are prohibited..
Sexual Harassment Definitions (See Title 29 Code of Federal Regulations 1604.11)
Two categories of sexual harassment between members of the opposite or same sex are recognized:
A. Quid Pro Quo - Sexual harassment presented as a “bargain” (quid pro quo). Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal and physical conduct of a sexual nature by one in a superior position constitutes “bargained-for sexual harassment” when submission by another is made either an explicit or implicit term or condition of employment or of academic standing. In this case, apparent consent of the submitting party is less relevant than the extent to which the sexual conduct is unwelcome. As defined here, “bargained-for sexual harassment” normally arises in the context of an authority relationship. This relationship may be direct as in the case of a supervisor and subordinate or teacher and student or it may be indirect when the harasser has the power to direct others who have authority over the victim.
B. Environmental Sexual Harassment – Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal and physical conduct of a sexual nature constitute “environmental sexual harassment” when such conduct has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive environment which unreasonably interferes with another’s work, academic performance or privacy. Environmental harassment can inflict emotional and psychological harm on individuals and can make relationships and the work or study environment unpleasant, threatening and unproductive. However, there is no requirement that evidence of actual emotional or physiological harm be shown in order for environmental sexual harassment to be found to have occurred.
In determining whether alleged conduct constitutes sexual harassment as defined in the policy, the record as a whole will be considered as well as the context in which the conduct occurred. “Environmental sexual harassment” normally arises from a repeated or pervasive course of conduct, whereas “bargained-for sexual harassment” can be based on a single act.
Facts will be judged on the basis of what is reasonable to persons of ordinary sensitivity and not on the particular susceptibility of an individual, unless that susceptibility is known to the alleged harasser.
Penalties will be determined on the basis of the facts of each case and the extent of harm to the University’s interests, as well as any University record indicating previous wrong doing by the accused person. Possible penalties are described in UNC Asheville’s SPA Disciplinary Actions Policy, the Faculty Handbook, the Student Handbook, the UNC Policy Manual, and the North Carolina Office of State Personnel Manual.
This policy seeks to encourage individuals to express freely, responsibly, and in an orderly way opinions and feelings about any problem or complaint of sexual harassment. Any act of retaliation against a complainant or witness is prohibited and will result in appropriate disciplinary action in accordance with disciplinary measures defined by applicable state or university disciplinary policies.
This policy shall not be used to bring frivolous or malicious complaints against students or employees. A person who brings a frivolous or malicious complaint will be subject to disciplinary action.
Information generated in the course of informal reviews and formal investigations necessary to enforcing this policy will be given the full extent of confidentiality accorded by law to employee personnel records and student educational records. Any person who, without authorization, reveals such information will be subject to disciplinary action. The sharing of the content of complaints will be on a “need to know” basis and will depend on the type of review and response required by the complaint. In any case when a complaint is being mediated or investigated, the person accused will be informed of the specific details of the complaint.
Responsibility for Reporting
Any University employee who has direct knowledge of sexual harassment that has occurred is obligated to inform the University’s Director of Employee Relations/Affirmative Officer immediately. Not to do so may result in serious consequences for the University, will be considered a breach of responsibility and may be grounds for disciplinary action.
Education and Outreach
To aid the University in achieving its mission by preventing sexual harassment, the Sexual Harassment Advisory Committee will assist the Director of Employee Relations and other University officials in their efforts to train, educate and advise members of the University community about sexual harassment so that the University will continue to be a safe and productive place to work and to learn.
Procedures: The purpose of these procedures is to provide a prompt and fair resolution of problems and to preserve the due process rights of all involved, including the right to
receive notice of complaints and to have an opportunity for an impartial investigation. These procedures also are created to provide for discipline of violators of the
University’s Sexual Harassment Policy. If necessary, however, the University’s administration may take immediate and reasonable action to stop harassment and is
not limited to the process provided herein.
I. Filing a Complaint
Complaints of violations of the University’s Sexual Harassment Policy will be accepted in writing or orally, however formal complaints (see B below) must be received in written form. Complaints will be taken seriously and investigated. Anyone who has observed sexual harassment should report it to his or her immediate supervisor, a department head/chair, vice chancellor or a sexual harassment advisory committee member (a current list of committee members may be found online at: http://www.unca.edu/service_committees/membership.asp). The ability to make a complaint is not limited to those who are the direct targets of the harassment.
A. Informal Resolution
Complaints of harassment addressed through the informal resolution process may be addressed through a variety of actions, including but not limited to the following:
1. The employee may discuss the concern(s) and the desired resolution with the alleged harasser, with or without the facilitation or presence of an employee relations representative or a supervisor.
2. The employee may address the alleged harasser in writing regarding the concern(s) and the desired resolution with or without the facilitation or presence of an employee relations representative or a supervisor.
3. The employee may ask an employee relations representative to notify the alleged harasser of the concern(s) and the desired resolution.
If the conduct has not stopped after the complainant’s communication or if the complainant does not wish to make the initial contact with the harasser, he/she may contact the University’s Director of Employee Relations or his/her immediate supervisor, a department head/chair, vice chancellor, or a member of the sexual harassment advisory committee (a current list of committee members may be found online at: http://www.unca.edu/service_committees/membership.asp). The person to whom the report is made shall report it immediately to the University’s Director of Employee Relations.
Advisory Note: Complaints by or about students must be presented to the Office of the Dean of Students. The Dean of Students, or designee, will work with Employee Relations on any cases involving harassment of a student by a UNC Asheville employee. In an instance of student-initiated harassment, the Dean of Students, or designee, shall investigate and take appropriate disciplinary action commensurate with the severity and/or frequency of the conduct. Discipline resulting from harassment by a student will be taken in accordance with the procedures provided in the Student Code of Conduct.
B. Formal Resolution
Employees who have a complaint of harassment may use the formal grievance procedures in accordance with UNC Asheville’s Unlawful Workplace Harassment policy. To use this procedure, the employee must submit a written complaint to Human Resources within 30 calendar days of the alleged harassing action. This is the required procedure for SPA employees who want to maintain their appeal rights to the State Personnel Commission.
SPA employees who do not submit a written complaint to Human Resources within 30 calendar days may still utilize the informal procedures described in Section I.A. for resolving their concern; however, such individuals will not have the option of later appealing to the State Personnel Commission or using any University appeal procedure.
Confidentiality shall be maintained to the greatest extent possible within the requirements of conducting reasonable investigations. Only those who have a need to know will or may find the identity of the parties.
Once a complaint is made to a University official or employee, the official or employee will forward the complaint to the Director of Employee Relations. He/she will maintain all records related to such cases separately from the University personnel files. Complaints will be investigated promptly and impartially.
The Director of Employee Relations may conduct the investigation or, if he/she deems it appropriate, will forward the complaint to an investigatory team for investigation and recommended action. The team is authorized to review, investigate and advise with respect to the adjustment of complaints related to sexual harassment filed by any member of the University community.
The investigatory team is authorized to meet with the complainant, the accused, and any witnesses in order to determine facts regarding the allegation. Meetings with the parties to the complaint should be conducted individually and should not take the form of a hearing. These meetings may be done by the team as a whole or by members designated by the chair.
An accurate record of all meetings and interviews shall be made by the investigatory team. These records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years and for as long as any of the parties are associated with the University. A final report of the findings of the team shall be made available under the supervision of the Director of Employee Relations to all parties to the complaint upon receipt, verbally or in writing, of a request from that party.
Upon completion of its review, the team shall make a report to the supervisor of the accused. The report shall consist of a summary of findings, including a statement of the charges, the evidence presented and a determination as to whether or not the complaint rises to the level of sexual harassment as defined by federal law. The supervisor will determine the appropriate action, in consultation with the Director of Employee Relations.
All reasonable attempts will be made to complete this entire process in a timely manner. Complaints shall be resolved within sixty (60) days from the date the complaint is received by the Director of Employee Relations. The Committee shall provide a written response to the complainant when it has been determined what action, if any, will result from the complaint.
Advisory Note: After the agency’s 60 calendar days (or less, if waived in writing), if the complainant is an SPA employee and the complaint has been filed in accordance with the Unlawful Workplace Harassment policy, the complainant may appeal directly to the Office of Administrative Hearings and the State Personnel Commission within the next 30 calendar days if he/she is not satisfied with the agency’s response to the complaint.
Any current or former State employee who feels he/she has been sexually harassed in violation of UNC Asheville and N.C. General Statute 126-16 may file a grievance through the UNC Asheville grievance procedures (as applicable to SPA, EPA Non-Faculty or EPA faculty.)
Applicants for positions governed by Chapter 126 of the N.C. General Statutes who believe that they have been sexually harassed may file grievances pursuant to that chapter of the General Statutes. Such grievances must be in compliance with the procedures set forth in UNC Asheville policies and with the North Carolina Office of State Personnel Manual.
Sexual harassment is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Employees or applicants may also choose to file a complaint of sexual harassment with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Additional References: UNC Code [Appendix I.C. (Personnel) and XII (Students)], Unlawful Workplace Harassment Policy
Related Policies: Improper Relationships between Students and Employees Policy, Unlawful Workplace Harassment Policy
Approved date: 7-29-08
Next review date: 7-29-10
4.3.13 Workplace Violence (SD3497S)
This policy applies to EPA and SPA full-time and part-time employees with permanent, probationary, trainee, time-limited permanent, temporary, or adjunct faculty appointments while engaged in any work for or on behalf of the University or on University premises.
Workplace Violence includes, but is not limited to, intimidation, threats, physical attack or property damage. Threat is the expression of an intent to cause physical or mental harm. An expression constitutes a threat without regard to whether the party communicating the threat has present the ability to carry it out and without regard to whether the expression is contingent, conditional or future. Physical Attack is unwanted or hostile physical contact such as hitting, fighting, pushing, shoving or throwing objects. Property Damage is intentional damage to property which includes roperty owned by the State, employees, visitors or vendors. Intimidation includes, but is not limited to, stalking or engaging in actions intended to frighten, coerce, or induce duress.
It is the intent of The University of North Carolina at Asheville to provide a workplace for all employees which is free of violence. In doing so, the University is complying with and supporting the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, which requires employers provide their employees with a safe and healthy work environment; and the North Carolina Office of State Personnel Policy No. 9 on Workplace Violence. To this end, it is the policy of UNC Asheville to prohibit any form of workplace violence.
3. Prohibited Actions and Sanctions
It is a violation of this policy to engage in workplace violence as defined above, or use or possess an unauthorized weapon during a time covered by this policy. Violations of this policy shall be considered unacceptable personal conduct for SPA employees as provided in Section 9 of the State Personnel Policy Manual "Disciplinary Action, Suspension, and Dismissal" and shall subject the employee to a disciplinary action up to and including dismissal. Violations of this policy will be addressed in accordance with the relevant procedures and penalties as provided in the Faculty Handbook section 3.6.1 (the Grievance Procedure) and section 13.1.1, Chapter VI, THE CODE section 603 (Due Process Before Discharge or the Imposition of Serious Sanction).
In situations considered to be potentially volatile or where fitness for duty concerns exist, management has the option to consider the use of a management directed referral as outlined in the UNC Asheville Policy on Employee Assistance Program.
4. Exceptions to Policy
An employee may possess a weapon if possession:
* Is in compliance with North Carolina law (North Carolina law prohibits weapons on state property.); and
* Is authorized by the University Chancellor or his/her designee; or
* Is by an employee who is a certified law enforcement officer; or
* Is required as a part of the employee's job duties with the State of North Carolina; or
* Is connected with training received by the employee in order to perform the responsibilities of their job with the State of North Carolina.
Employees who act in good faith by reporting real or implied violent behavior or violations of this policy will not be retaliated against or subjected to harassment.
Advisory Note: All employees are encouraged to be alert to the possibility of violence on the part of employees, former employees, visitors, students, strangers, and third party vendors on campus. Any report of violence will be handled in a confidential manner, with information released only on a need-to-know basis.
4.3.14 Conflict of Interest (SD3596S)
The Code of The University of North Carolina affirms that the basic mission of the faculty is "the transmission and advancement of knowledge and understanding." Faculty employment entails the three responsibilities of teaching, scholarly research and publication, and other professional service to the institution and to society. Realization of those objectives is facilitated and encouraged by certain distinctive characteristics of employment within an academic community which differs markedly from the conventional work-day and work-week employment models in most business and industrial settings.
At UNC Asheville faculty and professional staff responsibilities extend beyond time-specific assignments such as in-class teaching, designated office hours, etc. to include a broad range of professional activities necessary to accomplish our public liberal arts university mission. Achievement of these responsibilities necessitates a more fluid schedule and time commitment than is expected for hourly employees or in a non-academic setting. The freedom afforded these professionals carries with it a substantial responsibility to the University and our students.
Issues associated with the use of discretionary time and professional talent often concern what is commonly called Conflict of Commitment and Conflict of Interest. These terms are defined as follows (quoted from UNC BOG statement, 4/16/93):
"Conflict of commitment relates to an individual's distribution of effort between obligations to one's university employment and one's participation in other activities outside of university employment. The latter may include such generally encouraged extensions of professional expertise as professional consulting. Such activities promote professional development and enrich the individual's contributions to the institution, to the profession, and to society. However, a conflict of commitment occurs when the pursuit of such outside activities involves an inordinate investment of time that interferes with the faculty member's obligations to students, to colleagues, and to the missions of the university."
"Conflict of interest relates to situations in which financial or other personal considerations may compromise, may involve the potential for compromising, or may have the appearance of compromising a faculty member's objectivity in meeting university duties or responsibilities, including research activities. The bias that such conflicts may impart can affect many university duties, including decisions about personnel; the purchase of equipment and other supplies; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the sharing of research results; the choice of research protocols; and the use of statistical methods. A faculty member may have a conflict of interest when he or she, or any member of that person's immediate family, has a personal interest in an activity that may affect decision making with respect to university teaching, research or administration."
Policy on Conflict of Commitment
Policies and practices currently in place at UNC Asheville allow for regular and frequent review of faculty and professional staff and reporting of activities which may interfere with normal teaching and learning responsibilities and administrative functions. These policies and practices are described in the UNC Asheville Faculty Handbook and in the UNC Asheville Policies and Procedures Manual.
Policy on Conflict of Interest
All faculty members and professional staff persons must arrange their professional activities and financial interests to avoid circumstances that do (or may) prevent or limit objectivity in the performance of university responsibilities or that otherwise do (or may) affect adversely any university interests.
1. Categories of Potential Conflicts of Interest
Activities that may involve conflicts of interest can be categorized under three general headings. First, those that otherwise might appear to involve such a conflict but that in fact do not, are allowable, and need not be reported; second, those that are questionable and must be reported, but that may be allowable with administrative approval; and third, those that generally are not allowable.
A. Activities Allowable, with no Reporting Required
Activities external to university employment which may present the appearance of a technical conflict, but that in fact do not have the potential for affecting the objectivity of the faculty member's performance of university responsibilities. At most, some such situations could prompt questions about conflicts of commitment. Examples of these activities include:
1) A university employee receiving royalties from the publication of books or for the licensure of patented inventions subject to the UNC Patent and Copyright Policies.
2) A university employee having an equity interest in a corporation, the exclusive function of which is to accommodate the employee's external consulting activities.
3) A university employee receiving nominal compensation, in the form of honoraria or expense reimbursement, in connection with service to professional associations, service on review panels, presentation of scholarly works, and participation in accreditation reviews.
B. Activities Requiring Disclosure for Administrative Review
This category includes activities of faculty and professional staff which suggest the possibility of conflicting loyalties that can impair objectivity but for which disclosure and resulting analysis of relationships may render the activity permissible, perhaps with certain types of limitation or monitoring. Examples of activities in this category include but are not limited to:
1) Required purchase of textbooks or instructional materials written by faculty or immediate family members and which produces compensation for the author(s).
2) Maintenance of financial interests in a business which competes with services provided by the university.
3) Serving on a board of directors or advisory board of an enterprise which provides financial support for university research and which provides financial support to the university employee or a member of his/her family.
C. Activities or Relationships that Generally are not Allowable
Situations that are not generally permissible, because they involve potential conflicts of interest or they present obvious opportunities or inducements to favor personal interests over institutional interests. Before proceeding with such an endeavor, the faculty member must sustain the burden of demonstrating that in fact his or her objectivity would not be affected or university interests otherwise would not be damaged. These situations include but are not limited to:
1) Participation in university research involving a technology owned by or contractually obligated to (by license or exercise of an option to license, or otherwise) a business in which the individual or a member of his or her immediate family has a consulting relationship, has an ownership interest, or holds an executive position.
2) Participation in university research which is funded by a grant or contract from a business in which the individual or a member of his or her immediate family has an ownership interest.
3) Assignment of students or other trainees to university research projects sponsored by a business in which the individual or a member of his or her immediate family has an ownership interest or to a project from which the university employee may otherwise derive personal gain.
4) Acceptance of support for university research under conditions that require research results to be held confidential, unpublished, or inordinately delayed in publication (other than as allowed by University Patent and Copyright Policies or by policy of the Board of Governors dated February 12, 1988, Administrative Memorandum No. 260).
5) Referrals of university business to an external enterprise in which the individual or a member of his or her immediate family has a financial interest.
6) Association of an employee's own name with the university in such a way as to profit financially by trading on the reputation or goodwill of the university.
Avoiding Conflict of Interest
In August of each year, the CC and CI forms will be distributed to covered university employees by the appropriate Vice Chancellor. By the end of the first week of classes of each Fall Semester, all faculty members and professional staff are to submit to their immediate supervisor a completed Conflict of Commitment and Conflict of Interest form. Submissions are: to departmental chair or program director for faculty; to the VCAA for department chairs/program directors; to the appropriate Vice Chancellor for all professional staff; and, for the VC's, to the Chancellor. These records will be maintained in employees' personnel files.
Faculty members and professional staff are responsible for revising the information on their CC and CI form in order to keep it current. Revisions may be made as necessary at any time during the academic year and must be made in advance of the initiation of a new activity which may appear to involve either a Conflict of Commitment or Conflict of Interest.
4.3.15 Computing and Networking Usage Policy
UNC Asheville policy 72 states the obligations and rules that faculty, staff, volunteers, and others associated with the University must follow in their use of computing, Email, and networks at The University of North Carolina Asheville.
4.4 FORMS for Section 4.0
No forms for this section.
Faculty Handbook - version 8/12
Handbook for contracts dated prior to 7/1/03 (PDF)