THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT ASHEVILLE FACULTY SENATE Senate Document Number 0993S Date of Senate Approval 3/11/93 Signature of Senate Chair ________________________________ Date ________________ Action of Vice Chancellor: Approval _________________________________________ Date ___________________ Denied _________________________________________ Date ____________________ Reasons for denial and suggested modifications: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statement of Faculty Senate Action: Resolution The Faculty Senate endorses Chancellor Schuman's proposed Non-Smoking Policy as stated in his memo of February 24, 1993. (A copy of the memo follows) MEMORANDUM TO: Faculty Senate and Student Government Association FROM: Samuel Schuman DATE: February 24, 1993 RE: Proposed Non-Smoking Policy I am concerned about the increasingly persuasive evidence regarding the health hazards of passive smoke. A recent discussion by Dr. Rick Pyeritz, for example, emphasized the statistically demonstrable dangers to non-smokers occupying interior spaces in which smoking has gone on in both the near and not-so-near past. As I have thought about our institutional responsibility for the well-being of our students, faculty and staff, it has become more and more clear to me that this is an area in which administrative leadership may have to be pro-active. Accordingly, I am proposing that we ban all smoking in all inside spaces on campus with the sole exception of student residential rooms. This would include, obviously, all public spaces, hallways, lounges, and classrooms, as well as offices, recreational space in Justice Gymnasium and Highsmith Center, etc. I propose to put this plan in effect on July 1, at the beginning of our new academic year. Student Government Association, Faculty Senate, and Administrative Assembly are invited to react to this proposal. In particular, I would welcome an endorsement, any proposed modifications, or alternative plans. In order to move this important health program forward, I will construe the absence of reaction as acquiescence. In response to the needs of the smokers amongst us, I propose two additional steps. First, for those who continue to smoke, we will place attractive, additional ashtrays outside on campus. Second, and more importantly, I plan to ask Dr. Pyeritz and his colleagues in the Health Center to intensify on-campus programs aimed at helping those who wish to do so to kick the habit. I myself was a heavy smoker for nearly 20 years and I take no particular delight in restricting the choices individuals may make regarding their own habits and styles of living. But I have also witnessed first-hand the tragic, final years of a parent who died of lung cancer, and I feel a deep, personal ethical obligation not to expose the non-smoking members of our community to an increased risk of that terrible illness. I am quite willing to speak to any group of individuals about this matter and will look forward to hearing your collective response.