THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT ASHEVILLE FACULTY SENATE Senate Document Number 1692S Date of Senate Approval 3/5/92 Signature of Senate Chair __________________________ Date________ Action of Vice Chancellor: Approval _______________________________ Date________________ Denied _______________________________ Date________________ Reasons for denial and suggested modifications: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Statement of Faculty Senate Action: APC DOCUMENT #15: "Changes in Early Examination Policy" Effective Date: 1992-1993 Catalog and Academic Year DELETE: (on page 38) paragraphs 4, 5, and 6 under the heading Examinations and Early Evaluations. REPLACE with the following: Proficiency Examination. Any currently enrolled student may fulfill the requirement for many courses, including general education requirements, by passing a proficiency examination. Courses such as internships, theses, research seminars, field experiences, or any course which meets the departmental requirement of competency or is graded S/U are excluded from this option. The student fills out a proficiency examination form obtained from the registrar and makes arrangements with the department chair in which the course is taught to take an examination covering all material in the course. Any student who is in academic good standing may request the approval of the appropriate department chair to take a proficiency examination. Departments have the discretion to determine courses in which examination is appropriate. Grading will be "Pass" or "Fail". If passed the results will be noted on the student's transcript. The minimum number of hours for a degree will not be reduced. There is a $15 fee. ADD: to the beginning of paragraph 3 on page 38 the following: Major Competency. Rationale: These changes eliminate the option available to students to demand an early final examination for any course being taught. In addition to putting an extra burden on the faculty member with no risk for the student, it assumes that the final examination is the ultimate product toward which the course is preparation. The usual final examination, however, is often only a small portion of the grade and is not necessarily an accurate indicator that the student should receive credit for the course. In many cases a special extended examination would have to be prepared to incorporate material from other assignments. Further, the current policy could be exploited by students seeking insight into what future assignments may be like. The changes also curtail the number of courses for which a student can demand a proficiency examination. The proficiency policy rests on the assumption that a body of knowledge, not intellectual development, is the primary purpose of UNCA's courses. In a number of instances this is certainly true. The courses which have a different purpose, however, should not be constrained by the policy on proficiency examinations. These classes often do not have final examinations as part of their requirements and proficiency exams are either not possible or appropriate and defeat the purpose of the course. The last paragraph clarifies responsibility for determining which classes should be exempt from the proficiency policy.