SENATE DOCUMENT #17 ACADEMIC POLICIES COMMITTEE DOCUMENT #12 1984-85 The Academic Policies Committee recommends adoption of the following statement of policy in regard to the granting of continuing education units (C.E.U.'s): The University of North Carolina at Asheville will conform to the standards for awarding Individual Continuing Education Units as set forth by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools. The criteria established are: 1. Content is selected and is organized in a sequential manner. 2. There is evidence of pre-planning which should include opportunity for input by a representative of the target group to be served, the faculty area having content expertise, and continuing education personnel. 3. The activity is of an instructional nature and is sponsored or approved by an academic or administrative unit of the institution best qualified to affect the quality of the program content and to approve the resource personnel utilized. 4. There is a provision for registration for individual participants and to provide data for institutional reporting. 5. Appropriate evaluation procedures are utilized and criteria are established for awarding C.E.U.'s to individual students prior to the beginning of the activity. This may include the evaluation of student performance, instructional procedures, and course effectivenes. Adherence to these guidelines means that the Director of the Center for Continuing Education should examine carefully programs before awarding C.E.U.'s to their participants. In addition to applying the above criteria, the Center should submit all program information to the appropriate academic departments within the University for recommendations. Once received these should be forwarded to the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs for final approval or disapproval. If approved, the C.E.U.'s would be awarded. Rationale: UNCA subscribes to the accepted policies on granting C.E.U.'s for some educational experiences that do not receive academic credit. However, a more explicit policy is needed, especially for situations in which non-University groups ask us to grant C.E.U.'s for their programs. Often their program and our official certification can be genuinely beneficial to a certain clientele. To make this possible and to insure our closer involvement in the program, we propose the formal adoption of the above guidelines prepared by the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.