Senate Document #26 (APC Document #2) Amendments to the Policy on Academic Eligibility Standards Effective: August 1984 DELETE: Entire section titled "Academic Eligibility" (pp. 33,34, 1983-84 Catalog). Add: Academic Eligibility The University has established a minimum grade point average which must be met by students wishing to continue their studies. Failure to meet these standards will result in dismissal from the University. After August 27, 1984, a student whose cumulative grade point average at UNCA is less than a 2.00 at the end of any semester will be placed on Academic Probation. If, at the end of the following semester, the student does not achieve at least a grade point average for that semester of 2.25, the student, in the normal course of events, will be dismissed. If the student's cumulative grade point average is still below 2.00, the student must achieve a 2.25 grade point average in each succeeding semester until the student achieves a cumulative grade point average of 2.00 or the student, in the normal course of events, will be dismissed. A student on Academic Probation is not permitted to enroll in more than 12 semester hours during a Fall or Spring Semester, or for more than 4 semester hours during a summer term, to a maximum of 8 semester hours during the entire Summer Session. A grade point average of 2.0 on work completed at UNCA since the beginning of the Fall semester 1978 is required for graduation. Also, a minimum grade point average of 2.0 is required on all work attempted at UNCA in the major department. Work completed prior to Fall 1978 is not computed in the grade point average. Dismissed students who can show concrete evidence that their status should be reconsidered may petition the Admissions Committee for readmission. For further information about the appeals process, students should contact the Director of Enrollment Services. RATIONALE: After the passage of Senate Document #20, 1982-83, questions concerning the numbers of students who would be Page 2 subject to dismissal concerned the administration. There was special concern with the affect on minority students. Administration of the policy was seen as difficult due to its complexity. Part-time and improving full-time students could be dismissed when, in fact, Senate Document #20 was thought to be "forgiving" to the improving student. We have collected data which suggest that the number of students who would face dismissal in each semester after December 1984 would be approximately 5%. We do not have data presently available that would enable us to predict what percentage of that approximately 5% would be minority students. This amendment would be satisfactory to the Faculty Admission Committee, the Director of Enrollment Services (Ken Rice), the Registrar and the Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs.